Markets
Healthcare
Healthcare facilities serve some of the highest concentrations of people with disabilities of any building type. They are also among the most demanding environments for accessibility compliance. Hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, urgent care clinics, dental offices, medical practice offices, and specialty outpatient facilities all share a common challenge: clinical program requirements govern how rooms are organized and where equipment is placed, infection control protocols determine materials, door configurations, and pressure relationships, and both push directly against what the accessibility standards require. Getting to a design that actually works means resolving those conflicts deliberately.
Healthcare covers a wide range of facility types: hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, hospital-based outpatient units, independent urgent care clinics, medical and dental practice offices, rehabilitation facilities, and specialty outpatient centers. The distinctions between them matter for compliance. A hospital outpatient department, a rehabilitation clinic, and an independent medical practice operate under different accessibility parking rules alone. The governing standards are ADA 2010, IBC 2024, and ICC A117.1-2017, with state accessibility standards applied on top. In Texas that means the Texas Accessibility Standards 2012, enforced by TDLR. State healthcare facility licensing adds a separate regulatory track. In Texas, HHSC adopts the FGI Guidelines for Design and Construction of Hospitals and Outpatient Facilities for hospital licensing. California, Florida, Illinois, and other states have comparable or more stringent licensing requirements that run alongside the accessibility standards. FGI and its state equivalents set minimum room dimensions and design criteria for clinical function, and those minimums frequently fall short of what ADA and state accessibility standards require when accessible clearances, equipment placement, and turning space are laid out together. A room that satisfies FGI can still fail accessibility review. Clinical workflow requirements govern equipment placement, infection control protocols govern materials and door configurations, and all of it has to coexist with the accessible clearances, turning space, and route requirements that the standards impose.
Accessibility Considerations
- Accessible Parking — Hospital-Based Outpatient
ADA §208.2.1 / TAS §208.2.1
IBC §1106 / Advisory 208.2.1Hospital outpatient facilities require 10% of patient and visitor parking, which supersedes Table 208.2. The rule applies only to facilities or units located within hospitals providing regular and continuing medical treatment without overnight stay. Independent clinics, urgent care centers, and medical offices not located in a hospital do not qualify; they use Table 208.2. This distinction is widely misapplied in both directions. - Accessible Parking — Rehabilitation & Outpatient PT
ADA §208.2.2 / TAS §208.2.2Rehabilitation facilities specializing in treating conditions that affect mobility, and outpatient physical therapy facilities, require 20% of patient and visitor parking. That threshold supersedes both Table 208.2 and the hospital outpatient 10% requirement. Independent outpatient PT clinics qualify for this rule whether or not they are hospital-based. - Independent Clinics & Medical Offices
ADA §208.2 / TAS §208.2 — Table 208.2 appliesUrgent care centers, dental offices, medical practice offices, specialty outpatient clinics, and other independent healthcare facilities not located within a hospital are not hospital outpatient facilities under ADA/TAS. They use Table 208.2 for parking scoping and are governed by standard commercial occupancy accessibility requirements. The clinical program still creates many of the same equipment placement and clearance challenges found in hospital-based settings. - Patient Rooms
ADA §223 / TAS §223
IBC §1108.5 Group I-2
ICC A117.1 §805Medical care facilities must provide a percentage of patient rooms as accessible. Scoping differs for single-occupancy and multi-occupancy rooms. The technical requirements address door clearances, toilet room dimensions, turning space, reach ranges for controls and equipment, and clear floor space for patient transfer at the bed. IBC §1108.5 and A117.1 §805 apply on projects where the building code governs alongside ADA and TAS. - Medical Diagnostic Equipment
Access Board MDE Standards (2017) — advisory, not yet adopted as enforceable ADA ruleThe Access Board has published technical standards for accessible medical diagnostic equipment, covering examination tables, imaging equipment, and weight scales, but those standards have not been adopted as enforceable rules under the ADA. DOJ has stated that accessible medical equipment is a Title II and III program access obligation. The legal obligation exists; the technical standard is advisory. That gap affects every patient care space in the building. Examination rooms, imaging suites, operating rooms, procedure rooms, obstetric and labor and delivery suites, ICU rooms, dialysis stations, infusion rooms, and treatment spaces all present distinct equipment placement and transfer clearance problems that require evaluation on each project. - Patient Care Areas
ADA §206, §304–305 / TAS §206, §304–305
IBC §1108 / ICC A117.1 §304–305Examination rooms and treatment spaces require maneuvering clearances at door approaches, clear floor space for side and forward transfers, and adequate turning radius for power wheelchair users. FGI Guidelines, adopted by Texas HHSC for facility licensing and by comparable agencies in other states, establish minimum room dimensions for clinical function. Those dimensions frequently fall short of what ADA/TAS and A117.1 require once equipment placement, accessible clearances, and turning space are worked out together. Satisfying FGI alone does not satisfy accessibility requirements, and both must be met at the same time. - Service Counters & Reception
ADA §227, §904 / TAS §227, §904
IBC §1108.4 / ICC A117.1 §904Registration desks, nurse stations, pharmacy windows, and patient check-in counters require an accessible section at 28 to 34 inches above the finish floor with sufficient clear floor space for a parallel or forward approach. Healthcare service counters are among the most consistently non-compliant elements in plan review. Counter configurations are typically driven by casework layouts and clinical workflow, and the accessible section requirement is not coordinated into that process. - Infection Control & Accessible Design
ADA §206, §404 / TAS §206, §404
IBC §407Infection control requirements create specific conflicts with accessible design that must be worked through deliberately. Negative pressure isolation rooms require door air seals that increase opening force beyond the 5 lbf ADA/TAS maximum. That is a direct conflict and needs a design resolution on every room of that type. For door hardware, infection control protocols call for touch-limited or touchless operation, and ADA/TAS require one-hand operability at 5 lbf or less. Automatic door operators satisfy both at once and are the preferred solution in clinical areas. For floor surfaces, the sanitizable materials common in healthcare settings, such as VCT, sheet vinyl, and epoxy, are generally stable and firm and meet accessible route requirements, but any non-slip treatment applied to them cannot create rolling resistance that impedes wheelchair travel. For circulation, clean-to-soiled corridor arrangements in hospital planning require separate paths for different functions. The accessible route has to be identified within those constraints and cannot simply be assigned to a corridor that violates infection control zoning. - Path of Travel — Renovations
ADA 28 CFR §36.403 / TAS §202.4
16 TAC Chapter 68 (Texas)Healthcare renovation projects frequently trigger path of travel obligations under both ADA and TAS. When a primary function area is altered, the accessible path from parking through the building entrance to the altered area must be made accessible, including the restrooms, telephones, and drinking fountains serving that area, up to 20% of the primary alteration cost. On Texas-registered projects, the path of travel evaluation and any disproportionality determination are formal TDLR regulatory processes under 16 TAC Chapter 68, not internal design team calculations. Phased construction in occupied facilities creates additional obligations. The accessible route must be maintained throughout construction, or a compliant temporary alternative must be provided at each phase. - Signage
ADA §216, §703 / TAS §216, §703
IBC §1111 / ICC A117.1 §703Healthcare facilities run extensive signage systems. Room identification signs for permanent spaces require tactile characters and braille at specific mounting heights and locations. Overhead directional and informational signage has separate requirements. Electronic variable message signs, increasingly common in healthcare settings for wayfinding, patient tracking, and departmental directories, are addressed in A117.1 §703.7 but not in ADA or TAS. Healthcare signage programs frequently address clinical wayfinding without addressing the accessibility compliance requirements that run alongside it. - Turning Space & Clear Floor Space
ADA §304–305 / TAS §304–305
ICC A117.1 §304–305ICC A117.1 §304 and §305 establish larger dimensional requirements for turning space and clear floor space than ADA and TAS currently require. The larger dimensions reflect the footprint of modern power wheelchairs, motorized scooters, and other mobility devices, which are considerably larger than the manual wheelchair the ADA/TAS dimensions were originally based on. Healthcare settings see frequent use of power mobility devices. Designing to A117.1 dimensions rather than ADA/TAS minimums produces spaces that are more functionally usable and reduces the risk of a facility that is technically compliant with ADA/TAS but does not actually work for the patients it serves. - Adult vs. Children’s Requirements
ADA §102 / TAS §102
ADA §308 / §604.9Where a space is intended primarily for children, ADA/TAS permit children's specifications in lieu of adult requirements, with different toilet seat heights, lavatory heights by age group, and lower reach ranges. The complication in pediatric healthcare is that the facility must also serve adult caregivers and parents. Both sets of specifications are required throughout pediatric facilities. That dual requirement affects fixture selection, room sizing, and counter design on essentially every decision in the building. - Emergency Notification
ADA §215 / TAS §215
IBC §907Visual alarm notification devices are required in patient care areas, restrooms, and public spaces to provide emergency notification for patients and visitors who are deaf or hard of hearing. Healthcare facilities routinely address the audible fire alarm system without providing required visual notification in all required spaces.
Common Plan Review Findings
- Hospital outpatient parking at 10% incorrectly applied to independent clinics and medical offices not located within a hospital, or not applied at all to qualifying hospital-based outpatient units
- Rehabilitation facility and outpatient physical therapy parking at 20% not applied; Table 208.2 used instead
- Pediatric facilities designed to children's specifications only, without accommodation for adult caregivers and parents, which requires both sets of specifications simultaneously
- Patient room scoping errors: accessible room count incorrect, or accessible toilet room dimensions non-compliant
- Examination room door clearances insufficient for power wheelchair approach and maneuvering
- Medical equipment positioned without required clear floor space for parallel or forward approach and transfer
- Service counter heights non-compliant: registration desks and pharmacy windows without an accessible section at the required height
- Room identification signage without tactile characters and braille, or mounted at incorrect height or location
- Path of travel obligations not evaluated before renovation scope is finalized; on Texas-registered projects TDLR requires formal disproportionality determination, and the accessible path to parking, entrance, and restrooms from altered primary function areas is not provided or not documented
- Phased construction that interrupts accessible routes without providing compliant temporary alternatives at each phase
- Visual alarm notification devices missing from patient care areas, restrooms, or public waiting areas
How We Engage
We engage healthcare projects as early as programming, before equipment plans are developed, room sizes are fixed, or renovation scopes are finalized. In healthcare, the decisions that most affect accessibility compliance are made early. Room dimensions, equipment placement, counter locations, and door clearances are typically set by the healthcare planner and medical equipment planner before the architect has issued a construction document set. Being involved at that stage means we are in those conversations, not reviewing their outcome.
For renovation projects subject to TDLR registration in Texas, path of travel obligation analysis comes first. Both ADA and TAS impose path of travel obligations when a primary function area is altered, and on Texas-registered projects the disproportionality determination is a formal TDLR regulatory process under 16 TAC Chapter 68, not an internal calculation. The scope of required path of travel work directly affects budgets and schedules, and it has to be understood before the construction document phase begins. We work with the design team and owner to identify what triggers the obligation, what the accessible path must include, and what the 20% ceiling means for the specific project.
Healthcare design involves parallel regulatory tracks reviewed by different agencies. In Texas, ADA/TAS and IBC/A117.1 are reviewed by TDLR on registered projects. The FGI Guidelines, adopted by HHSC for facility licensing under 25 TAC Chapter 133, are reviewed by HHSC. Other states have comparable licensing review processes through their health departments. FGI is not an accessibility standard, but its minimum room dimensions routinely conflict with the maneuvering clearances and turning space that ADA/TAS and A117.1 require. A room that meets FGI minimums is not necessarily accessible. We help design teams navigate both tracks, identify where FGI and accessibility requirements cannot be simultaneously satisfied at minimum dimensions, and work through the resolution. Accessible medical diagnostic equipment is a particular focus. Owners and healthcare systems need to understand their obligations in that area even where no final enforceable rule has been adopted.
The facility type matters. A hospital, an urgent care clinic, a dental office, and an outpatient PT center have different parking obligations, different program drivers, and different standard interactions. We work across the full range, from large hospital campuses to single-provider practice offices, with the same level of analysis applied to each. Pediatric facilities require particular attention. The requirement to accommodate both children and adult caregivers simultaneously runs through nearly every design decision in those buildings.